Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-18

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9417 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9417 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9417 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9417 of 2026 Deepak .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sachin Malik Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit preferred by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The instant application under section 528 BNSS has been preferred to quash the cognizance/summoning order dated 05.07.2022 as well as the entire proceedings of Session Trial No.388 of 2022 (State vs. Mohit & Others) arising out of Case Crime No.94 of 2022, under sections 395, 412, 216A IPC, P.S. Khekra, District- Baghpat, pending in the court of learned District and Sessions Judge, Baghpat. 4. Learned counsel for applicant argued that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case only on account of the fact that he is uncle of co-accused Ashwani, since no offence as alleged has ever been committed by him. It has also been argued by learned counsel for applicant that the there is no material collected by the inquiry off

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 9417 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam