Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-15

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 20141 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 20141 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 20141 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 20141 of 2026 Ramesh Chand Jain .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satish Kumar Tyagi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. 1. Heard, Shri Satish Kumar Tyagi, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Madhvendra Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the Case No. 664 of 2019 arising out of Case Crime No. 127 of 2016 under Sections 3/7 of Essential Commodities Act, Police Station- Iglas, District Aligarh as well as cognizance/ summoning order dated 02.04.2019 pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Aligarh. 3. While assailing the impugned order, contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that learned Magistrate has not applied judicial mind in passing the order as the order has been made on a printed proforma, in which the name of the accused, case crime number and Section has been filled up by hand. 4. Relying upon the decision of this Court in Ankit

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 20141 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam