Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-06

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 18673 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 18673 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 18673 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 18673 of 2026 Raghvendra Shukla .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. 2. The present application has been preferred for seeking quashing of entire proceeding of Case no. 391 of 2025 (State vs. Raghvendra) arising out of Case Crime no. 439 of 2025 under sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC, PS- Sadar Bazar, District Shahjahanpur and set aside the cognizance order dated 9.4.2024 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shahjahanpur and charge sheet dated 28.8.2023. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant has challenged the impugned charge sheet along with cognizance/summoning order and entire proceedings of the present case precisely on the ground that Sections 420 and 406 IPC cannot go together in the same breath as per the proposition of law settled by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another report

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 18673 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam