Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-04

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11872 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11872 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11872 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 11872 of 2026 Jamat Ali .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar, Mohit Singh, Ravi Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite parties. 2. The instant application under section 528 BNSS has been preferred to quash the charge-sheet dated 24.06.2025 and cognizance/summoning order dated 10.07.2025 as well as the entire proceedings of Session Trial No.233 of 2025 (State vs. Jamat Ali) arising out of Case Crime No.71 of 2025, under section 152 IPC, P.S. Hajratnagar Garhi, District- Sambhal, pending in the court of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sambhal. 3. Learned counsel for applicant argued that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case by opposite party no.2 maliciously by concealing the correct facts. It has also been argued by learned counsel for applicant that there is no evidence against the applicant that the alleged video was posted by him on Facebook nor

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11872 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam