ANUJ NIRWANI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

232 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-13903-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 12.05.2026 ANUJ NIRWANI .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Gaurav Datta, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.). Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG, Haryana. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 528 BNSS and all other enabling provisions for issuance of writ/direction in the nature of mandamus or such other appropriate writ/direction directing official respondent No.2 to ensure the protection of life and personal liberty of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner has already been decided. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. (MANDEEP PANNU) 12.05.2026 JUDGE himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HIMANSHU 2026.05.13 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document