Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-07

ANSHU NAYYAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

Citation / case number
CWP 28441/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ANSHU NAYYAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-28441-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106 CWP-28441-2025 Date of Decision: 07.05.2026 DR. ANSHU NAYYAR …Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Ms. Jasneet Kaur, Advocate with Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release pensionary benefits to the petitioner under the Old Pension Scheme (OPS). 2. The petitioner approached this Court with a grievance that she was appointed as Lecturer (College Cadre) in the respondent/Department on 07.07.2006, pursuant to the advertisement published on 16.07.2005. Initially she was made a member of the New Pension Scheme (NPS), but later the Government issued an office memorandum dated 08.05.2023, Annexure P-1, whereunder an option was given to the employees who have been appointed in response to an advertisement issued prior to 28.10.2005, to opt for the OPS under the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume II [now Haryana Civil Services (Pension) Rules,