Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-13

ANOOP vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRM-M 26149/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ANOOP
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-26149-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 239 CRM-M-26149-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 13.05.2026 Anoop ..... Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana & Anr. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Omkar Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Malhotra, DAG Haryana. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. This petition for bail, which is fourth petition filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.179 dated 24.12.2024 for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2) and 241 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, [corresponding Sections 420, 419, 120-B and 204 of ] and Sections 66-C and 66-D of Information Technology Act, Police Station Cyber Crime, District Kurukshetra. 2. The abovementioned FIR came into being at the instance of ‘Ranjeet Singh’, hereinafter being referred to as ‘complainant’ only. It was stated by above-named complainant that he was subjected to digital arrest and thus, duped for a sum of Rs.10,10,000/-. In his abovementioned VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.05.14 09:48 I attest to the acc