ANOOP KUMAR GACHLI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP-14574-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 CWP-14574-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.05.2026 Anoop Kumar Gachli ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate and Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner back in service and consequently allow him to retire after attaining the age of superannuation w.e.f. 30.04.2025. Further a writ of mandamus has been sought, directing the respondents to release all the retiral benefits admissible to the petitioner @ 18% per annum from the due date till its actual realization and to decide the representation dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P-3) filed by the petitioner in a time-bound manner. 2. On 19.05.2026, the following order was passed:- MOHD YAKUB 2026.05.27 14:50 I attest to the accura