Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21
ANKUR GUPTA vs STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
- Citation / case number
- CWP 12416/2026
- Court
- Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Petitioner
- ANKUR GUPTA
- Respondent
- STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
Judgment text excerpt
CWP-12416-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 CWP-12416-2026 Date of Decision: 21.05.2026 Ankur Gupta …Petitioner Versus State Bank of India and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Chirag Suri, Advocate and Ms. Lavika Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Saurav Goyal, Advocate for respondents *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent No.2 to restore net banking facility in his bank account maintained with State Bank of India. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent-bank had frozen petitioner’s account without notice. As per petitioner’s information, the bank has acted upon directions of Law Enforcement Agencies. He approached respondent No.2-bank which de-freezed his bank account, however, net banking facility still remains blocked/unrestored. He has made numerous requests to respondent-bank seeking redressal of his grievance but to no avail. 3. Learned counsel for respondents submits that bank officials are trying to restore petitioner’s net banking facility. He assur