ANKIT RATHOD vs STATE OF HARYANA

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 223 CRM-M-23076-2026 Date of Decision: 06.05.2026 ANKIT RATHOD ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. KREK Present: Mr. Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG, Haryana. ak 2 ek AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State Counsel submits that the charges have not yet been framed and in such like cases, even the complainant is necessary to be examined, in view of which, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition at this stage. 2. Ordered accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) MAY 06, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned _ : Yes/No Whether reportable . Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.05.06 18:07 | attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order