ANKIT KUMAR YADAV vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 07th May, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 1340/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5363/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5364/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5365/2026 ANKIT KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. K.S. Sharma, Advocate with Petitioner in person. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP W/SI Surabhi, PS-Amar Colony. Advocate for Respondent Nos.2-3 (Appearance not given). Respondent Nos.2-3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner herein seek quashing of FIR No. 235/2024 dated 03.08.2024, registered at Police Station Amar Colony, for commission of offences under Sections 376 IPC & 6 POCSO Act, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. The abovesaid FIR was registered on the basis of a complaint made by prosecutrix, who was studying in class 12th at the relevant time, and she claimed that petitioner, had, earlier, inappropriately touched her and, thereafter, made forcible physical relation with her. It was only when she became pregnant because of such physical relationship and taken to the hospital, she, eventually, revealed about the abovesaid fact, which resulted in Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 1340/2026 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:08.05.2026 16:29:54 the registration of the abovesaid FIR. 3. Charge-sheet was filed for commission of offences u/s 6 POCSO Act and 376 IPC and charges were also framed under those sections and the case is at the stage of trial. 4. The prosecutrix has already entered into the witness box and her testimony indicates that she is not firm in her stand. 5. In her examination, she did not utter a single word against the accused and, therefo