Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-26

ANKIT KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 29137/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ANKIT KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-29137-2026 -1 230 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29137-2026 Date of Decision:26.05.2026 Ankit Kumar …Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. A.V.S Parmar, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, Sr.DAG, Haryana. *** N.S.Shekhawat J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the fourth petition under Section 483 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to grant regular bail to him in case FIR No. 92, dated 19.02.2022, registered under Sections 20 and 61 of N.D.P.S Act, Police Station Hodal, District Palwal, Haryana (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was falsely involved in the present case without any evidence in the present case. Further, as per the challan itself, the petitioner was a paid carrier and real organiser Balinder @ Billu has not been arrested so far. Even the vehicle belonged to third party and the ganza was allegedly uploaded by some unknown person. Still further, the police had not complied with the mandatory provisions of Section 42 & 50 of NDPS Act and the entire search and seizure is completely vitiated. Sti