ANJU KANSAL vs UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND OTHERS

217(O) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-33714-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 Anju Kansal ...Petitioner Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Akshay Jindal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tushar Kush, Advocate, Mr. Amiya Malhotra, Advocate and Mr. Vrishank Suri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. Dr. Rao P.S. Girwar, Advocate and Mr. Ashish Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate (Through V.C.) and Mr. Arnav Sharma, Advocate for the HPCL. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to restore electricity connection bearing No.425433000 in her premises wherein a petrol pump is being operated. 2. As per pleadings, the petitioner entered into dealership agreement with Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (‘HPCL’) for managing and operating a petrol pump situated at Village Ismailabad, PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.05.30 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this documen