ANJALI SHARMA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (114) CRWP-5054-2026 DATE OF DECISION: 01.05.2026 Anjali Sharma and another ........Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others .........Respondents CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present Mr. Divyansh Shukla, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Satbir Singh Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. *** SUBHAS MEHLA, J (ORAL) 1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents and not to interfere in their lives. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are major and are residing together in a live-in relationship and live-in- relationship deed is Annexure P-1, but they apprehend threat to their life and liberty from the private respondents. While drawing the attention of this Court to representations dated 25.04.2026 (Annexures P-2 and P-3), learned counsel has submitted that the matter was reported to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Nuh and respondent no3-Commissioner of Police, Faridabad, seeking police protection