ANJALI KUMARI AND ANR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 136 CRWP-5483-2026 Date of decision: 08.05.2026 ANJALI AND ANOTHER ......Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Mr. Saurabh Verma, Advocate for Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The petitioners namely Anjali and Md. Yakin have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their lives and personal liberty from private respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the petitioners are major and are staying together in a live in relationship. However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A representation dated 07.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) against the threat extended at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the petitioners to the Commissioner of Police, District Ludhiana. The petitioners VISHAL SHARMA 2026.05.08 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integr