ANJALI JAYANT vs KUSUM SINGH & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 23rd March, 2026 Pronounced on: 20th May, 2026 + CM(M) 1776/2023 & CM APPL. 56421/2023, 17994-95/2026 ANJALI JAYANT @ LAXMI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhuvan Jayant, Ms. Maitri Goel, Ms. Prachi Goel, Mr. Varun Ranjan and Mr. Rittik Pandey, Advocates. versus KUSUM SINGH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Dubey, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA JUDGMENT AMIT SHARMA, J. 1. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeks following prayers: - “i. Set aside the impugned order dated 26.07.2023 passed by the Ld. Senior Civil Judge, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in case titled 'Kusum Singh vs. Vikas Singh & Anrs.' bearing CS No. 24/2023 and transfer the case CS No. 24/2023 titled as 'Kusum Singh vs. Vikas Singh & Anrs.'to the concerned Family Court, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi and Signature Not Verified Signed By:NEETI CM(M) 1776/2023 Page 1 of 19 KUMARI SHARMA Signing Date:21.05.2026 17.30 ii. Pass such order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the given facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice.” 2. The present petition assails the impugned order dated 26.07.2023 passed by learned Civil Judge, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts in CS No. 24/2023, whereby application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC filed on behalf of the present petitioner/defendant No.2 was dismissed and the case was put up for completion of pleadings and further proceedings. 3. The subject suit, CS 24/2023, was filed on behalf of respondent no. 1/plaintiff seeking mandatory and permanent injunction along with mesne profits with pendente lite and future interest against present petitioner and respondent