Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-09

ANISHA AND ANOTHER vs WASEEM AKRAM AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
FAO 5513/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ANISHA AND ANOTHER
Respondent
WASEEM AKRAM AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH 587 FAO-5513-2025 (O&M) ANISHA AND ANOTHER VS WASEEM AKRAM AND OTHERS Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. P.H.S. Pannu, Advocate with Mr. Sarthak Mehta, Advocate, Ms. Rajni Godara, Advocate and Mr. Rohan Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.3-SBI, General Insurance Company Ltd. *** CM-18757-CII-2025 Learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondent(s) are ad idem that the parties to the appeal in question are ready to settle the matter in question in all respects but an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal is pending decision. In view of their such stand, delay of 272 days in filing the appeal is condoned. CM is disposed of. FAO-5513-2025 As agreed in terms of statements of learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel and representative of the respondent-Insurance Company (separately recorded), a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lacs Only) over and above the amount awarded by the Tribunal is allowed to the appellant(s) in full and final settlement of the claim in this appeal. As per the NISHA 2026.05.13 16.54 I attest to the accuracy and