ANIL YADAV & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7053/2026, CM APPL. 34580/2026, CM APPL. 34581/2026 & CM APPL. 34582/2026 ANIL YADAV & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Dinesh Jotwani, Mr. Adil Muneer Andrabi, Ms. Harpreet Oberoi, Mr. Meahul Roy, Mr. Adesh Nandal, Mr. Akshat Kapoor, Ms. Disha Aneja and Ms. Sharanya Tripathi, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kartik Bhatnagar, CGSC with Mr. Sambhav Sharma, GP, Ms. Aditi Bhatt, Ms. Astha Prasad and Mr. Dinesh Vishwakarma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER(ORAL) % 20.05.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The prayer in the Original Application which stands disposed of by the Central Administrative Tribunal1 by order dated 25 March 2026, under challenge in the present writ petition, read thus: “8. Relief(s) Sought: In view of the facts and grounds stated above, the 1 “the Tribunal”, hereinafter 2. During the pendency of proceedings before the Tribunal, the Railway Board itself withdrew the letter dated 16 December 2024. 3. As such, the Tribunal has held that the main grievance in the OA stands redressed and has disposed of the OA. 4. Though the petitione