ANIL KUMAR SHARMA vs AMIT KUMAR AND OTHERS

144 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1708-2026 Date of decision: 14.05.2026 Anil Kumar Sharma ...Petitioner Versus Amit Kumar and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. G.S. Madaan, Advocate and Mr. Jiteshwar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ujval Mittal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Amit Jhanji, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned Senior counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 has submitted that in pursuance of the order passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court on 17.11.2025, a detailed speaking order dated 24.04.2026 has been passed which has been annexed as Annexure R-3 along with reply dated 24.04.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not satisfied with the said speaking order and thus, the present contempt petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioner to challenge the said speaking order, in accordance with law. 3. Ordered accordingly. 14.05.2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.05.14 16:40 I attest to