Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-07

ANIL KUMAR ALIAS AJAY vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 17657/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ANIL KUMAR ALIAS AJAY
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M No.17657 of 2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 144 CRM-M No.17657 of 2026 (O&M) Date of decision:07.05.2026 Anil Kumar @ Ajay ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG, Punjab. SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral): This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, seeking for quashing of order dated 13.03.2026 (Annexure P-9), whereby he has been declared a proclaimed offender. The abovementioned order has been passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jalandhar, hereinafter being referred to as ‘trial Court’ only, in a case arising out of FIR No.28 dated 25.04.2019, under Section 379 [Sections 379-B and 411 were added lateron] of Indian Penal Code and Section 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act, Police Station Nurmahal, District Jalandhar. 2. Notice of motion. 3. Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG, Punjab, has appeared on behalf of respondent-State. MANOJ KUMAR 2026.05.08 11:08 I attest to the accuracy and