AMRIK SINGH vs THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER

201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-9982-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.05.2026 Amrik Singh and Others ...Petitioners Versus The Financial Commissioner (Appeals-II), Punjab, Chandigarh and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Hiten Chugh, Advocate for Mr. S.S. Salar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Jindal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. B.S. Mann, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Nagra, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 19. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of order dated 29.04.1998 (Annexure P-1) as well as orders dated 11.02.1994, 30.08.1994 and 16.10.1994 whereby authorities have held that Gram Panchayat is necessary party in the partition proceedings. They are further seeking direction to Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Dhuri to decide their application seeking partition. 2. Learned counsel representing the respondents submit that one application seeking partition with respect to 5 Khewats was filed PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.05.18 17:11 I attest to the accur