AMIT vs STATE OF HARYANA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (208) CRM-M-7045-2026 DATE OF DECISION: 07.05.2026 Amit ........Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana .........Respondent CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present Mr.Pawan Kumar Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satbir Singh Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. *** SUBHAS MEHLA, J (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to order dated 09.02.2026, passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is no more required in this case. 2. Learned State counsel has not refuted the aforesaid assertions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and further, on instructions from ASI Surender Singh, submits that the petitioner is not required by the police for further investigation or custodial interrogation. 3. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and order of interim bail dated 09.02.2026, passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. 07.05.2026 (SUBHAS MEHLA) mamta JUDGE Whether speaking