Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

AMIT KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 15284/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
AMIT KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

211-B IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15284-2026 Date of Decision: 18.05.2026 AMIT KUMAR ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. RS Rai, Sr. Advocate (through VC) with Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate, Ms. Sukriti Rai, Advocate and Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Viney Phogat, DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the petition under Section 482 of BNSS is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case registered against him vide FIR No.0658 dated 11.11.2025 under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61, 3(5) and 344 of BNS, 2023 and Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 PS Assandh, District Karnal. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 10.04.2026 passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation. The learned State Counsel on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined investigation in terms of order dated 10.04.2026 and is not required for custodial interrogation. In this view of the matter, interim order dated 10.04.2026 is