Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-05

AMIT KUMAR TYAGI vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 21703/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
AMIT KUMAR TYAGI
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

2026:PHHC:069347 oo. CRM-M-21703-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 217 CRM-M-21703-2026 Date of decision : 05.05.2026 AMIT KUMAR TYAGI ... PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA .. RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- § Mr. Vinod Ghai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arnav Ghai, Advocate, Mr. R.S. Bagga, Advocate and Mr. Akash Balyan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for the complainant. oe KK H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking regular bail under Section 483 BNSS, 2023(erstwhile Section 439 Cr.P.C.), in case FIR No.766 dated 31.12.2025, registered under Sections 406, 420 IPC (now Sections 316(2), 318(4) of BNS) and Sections 21 & 22 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, 2019, at Police Station Sector 32-33, Karnal, District Karnal. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the complainant-Vijay Pal, was allegedly induced by the petitioner to invest money in a company namely “A to Z Company”. It is alleged that the petitioner assured the complainant that he will get returns ranging from 10% to 30% on his investment by forming a team 2026.