AMIT KUMAR @ MITTA vs STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M-17130-2026 (O&M) 1 225-2 2026:PHHC:070187 oe IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17130-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 06.05.2026 AMIT @ MITTA «es PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA «+s RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Kapil Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Brijesh Nandan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG, Haryana. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) 1. This is the first petition under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023/Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 157 dated 29.07.2024 u/s 287, 62, 3(5), 308(2), 351 (2), 111(2)B, 111(6), of BNS, 2023, (Corresponding to Sections 384, 285, 506, 34, 511 of IPC, 1860) registered at Police Station Thanesar City, Distt. Kurukshetra (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and the allegations levelled in the FIR are vague, general and devoid of any specific role or overt act attributable to him. It is further submitted that the prosecution case is primarily based upon subsequent investigation and statements which are yet poonam nor be tested during trial. Learned counsel submi