Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

AMIT CHAUHAN vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 11084/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
AMIT CHAUHAN
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 208 CRM-M-11084-2026 Date of decision: 04.05.2026 AMIT CHAUHAN ......Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .......Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Mr. Punyaveet, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Paras Talwar, Senior DAG, Haryana. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of pre-arrest bail in case bearing FIR No. 33 dated 03.02.2026 registered under Section 21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 at Police Station Sector 14, Gurugram. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that pursuant to the order dated 25.02.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required for investigation of the case. VISHAL SHARMA 2026.05.04 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-11084-2026 -2- Learned State counsel on instruction from concerned Investigating Officer corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of inve