AMBIKA CONCAST PVT LTD AND ANR vs STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS

CWP-26537-2022 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (110) CWP-26537-2022 Date of decision:- 12.05.2026 Ambika Concast Private Limited and another ... Petitioner Versus State Bank of India and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the respondents No.1 and 2-Bank. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This Court passed the following order on the previous hearing:- “On 30.09.2024, this Court passed the following order:- “Following order was passed on 28.11.2023:- Despite last opportunity having been sought to address arguments, arguing counsel for petitioners is not present. It is submitted that he had to leave Court premises due to some unavoidable reasons. At request, which is not opposed, adjourned to 19.12.2023. In case, arguments are not advanced, interim order in favour of petitioners may be vacated.” Today arguing counsel for the petitioners is not present, he is stated to be in personal difficulty. At request, adjourned to 22.01.2025 for arguments, however, interim order in favour of the petitioners is vacated.” A written