AMARJOT SINGH SIDHU vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

121 CWP-PIL-148-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-PIL-148-2026 Date of decision: 29.05.2026 AMARJOT SINGH SIDHU ….PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: - Mr. H.S. Dhindsa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Chanchal K. Singla, Sr. Advocate/Addl. A.G. (arguing counsel) with Ms. Medha Dewan, Advocate; Ms. Kavita Joshi, Advocate; Ms. Archana, Advocate. Mr. Arjun Dhaliwal, Advocate for Ms. Deepali Puri, Advocate for respondent No.6. SHEEL NAGU, C.J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.1 to 4 to take action against the private respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that for redressal of their grievance, the petitioner has already moved representation dated 28.01.2026 (Annexure P-8) before the respondent No.3- The Chief Director, Vigilance Bureau, Punjab Vigilance Bhawan, SAS Nagar Mohali, but till date no action thereon has been taken. He KANIKA further s