Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-11

AMARJIT SINGH @ CHEEMA vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 20926/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
AMARJIT SINGH @ CHEEMA
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-20926-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 206 AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20926-2026 Date of decision: 11.05.2026 AMARJIT SINGH @ CHEEMA ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Sahil Puri, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S.GREWAL,J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition for anticipatory bail filed under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Section 438 of Cr.P.C) in case FIR No.207 dated 25.08.2025 under Section 15 of NDPS Act (offence un- der Section 29 NDPS added subsequently) registered at Police Station City Ra- jpura, District Patiala. 2. The case of the prosecution is that 40 kg of poppy husk was recovered from a vehicle owned by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence. It is further submitted that the vehicle of the petitioner had already been stolen on 22.08.2025, i.e. prior to 25.08.2025, the date on which the alleged recovery was effected and a report regarding the theft had been duly lodged. 4. Learned State counsel submits that during investigation, no credible evidence was produced by the petitioner