Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

AMARJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER vs SATNAM SINGH AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CR 6174/2019
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
AMARJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER
Respondent
SATNAM SINGH AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CR-6174-2019 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CR-6174-2019 Date of decision : 27.05.2026 Amarjit Singh and another ... Petitioners Versus Satnam Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 06.09.2019 (Annexure P-1) passed by the trial Court vide which the evidence of the plaintiffs-petitioners has been closed by order. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have filed a suit for declaration to the effect that the plaintiffs are owners in possession as co-sharers of the land in question and has submitted that the delay in the proceedings would primarily prejudice the petitioners. It is submitted that on 14.12.2018, two plaintiff witnesses were present and they were examined-in-chief and their cross-examination was deferred on the request of learned counsel for the defendants and the case was adjourned DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.05.29 16:49 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judg