AMARDEEP ANEJA vs STATE OF PUNJAB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 CRM-M-2668-2026 Date of decision : 01.05.2026 AMARDEEP ANEJA ...... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate with Ms. Prerna Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Divij Datt, Advocate for the complainant. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH. J.(Oral) 1. This petition for pre-arrest bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.224 dated 19.10.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 351(3), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nayana Sanhita, 2023, Police Station City Moga, District Moga. 2. Vide order dated 06.03.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bail/surety VIPIN KUMAR 2026.05.01 20:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-2668-2026 2 bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the inve