Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-08

AMAN ALIAS CHURNIA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 59948/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
AMAN ALIAS CHURNIA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-59948-2025 -1- (105) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-59948-2025 Date of Decision: 08.05.2026 AMAN @ CHURNIA ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Viney Phogat, DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. The prayer in the present petition under Section 483 BNSS is for the grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No.134 dated 24.02.2025 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of BNS and Section 25(1-B) of Arms Act (Section 27 of Arms Act added later on) at Police Station HTM Hisar, District Hisar. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the statement of the complainant has been recorded during the course of the trial and he has not supported the prosecution version. Rohit, the purported main accused has been granted the concession of regular by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Hisar vide order dated 02.05.2026. The copy of the order dated 02.05.2026 is marked as X. As the petitioner is in custody since 16.03.2025 but only 01 of the 22 prosecution witnesses has been examined so far, the Trial of the JITESH LA