AKASH BHALLA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 270-3 CRM-M-4811-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 6th May, 2026 Akash Bhalla and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Karan Vir Nanda, Advocate for the petitioners. (through VC) Mr. Neeraj Poswal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Ankit Bishnoi, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous since a petition seeking quashing of the same FIR, which is the subject matter of the present petition, on the basis of compromise, has already been allowed by this Court. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Since the main petition has already been disposed of, pending application, if any, is rendered infructuous. [MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 6th May, 2026 Parveen Sharma 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.05.07 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of th