Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-13

AJAY PURI ALIAS AJAY KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 1478/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
AJAY PURI ALIAS AJAY KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

-1- 2026:PHHC:075081 eae IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210 CRM-M-1478-2026 Date of decision: 13.05.2026 AJAY PURI ALIAS AJAY KUMAR ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB .... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Prince Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amritpal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab. Ms. Manpreet Ghuman, Advocate for the complainant through video conferencing. 2k ook 2 ok RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is Ist petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (for short-‘BNSS’) seeking grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.102, dated 11.05.2025, registered under Sections 118(1), 115(2), 49 of BNS, 2023 (Section 238 BNS added later on) registered at Police Station Canal Colony Bathinda, District Bathinda. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had caused injuries on the person of the complainant. Hence the present FIR. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has argued that there is an unexplained delay of more than 20 days in registration of the FIR, which creates serious doubt