Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

AJAY DHANDA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRM-M 23378/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
AJAY DHANDA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-23378-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 303 CRM-M-23378-2026 Date of Decision:18.05.2026 AJAY DHANDA ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Manan Kheterpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, A.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Yogit Mehta, Advocate for respondent No.2. RAJESH BHARDWAJ.J (Oral) 1. Instant petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.453 dated 24.08.2022, under Sections 323, 324, 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Kaithal City, District Kaithal (Annexue P-1) as well as all other consequential proceedings arising thereto on the basis of compromise deed dated 07.04.2026 (Annexure P-2). 2. FIR in question was got registered by complainant-respondent No.2 and the investigation commenced thereon. However, with the intervention of respectables, finally the parties arrived at settlement and they resolved their inter se dispute, which is apparent from Compromise Deed, annexed as Annexure P-2. On the basis of the compromise, petitioners are invoking the inherent power of this Court by praying that continuation of these proceedings would be a futile exerc