AJAIB SINGH vs BHUPINDER SINGH

101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-132-1994 (O&M) Reserved on 12.02.2026 Pronounced on : 13.05.2026 Uploaded on : 13.05.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes Ajaib Singh (since deceased) thr. LRs. & ors. ….Appellants Versus Bhupinder Singh & anr. ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN ***** Present:- Mr. M.L.Sarin, Senior Advocate with Ms. Himani Sarin, Advocate for the appellants. Ms. Gurneet Sagoo, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. S.S.Swaich, Advocate Mr. G.S.Salana, Advocate Ms. Ishani Goyal, Advocate and Mr. Shakti Mehta, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. 1 Plaintiffs are in second appeal. For convenience, parties hereinafter are referred to by their original position in the suit, i.e. the appellants as plaintiffs and respondents as defendants. 2 Plaintiffs filed suit seeking decree of joint possession of the suit land. As per the plaintiffs, Ralla Singh was the owner of land situated within POOJA SHARMA 2026.05.13 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document the revenue estate of Village Bugga, forming part of the suit land. He was un