Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-06

ADITYA DUTT vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRM-M 56958/2022
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
ADITYA DUTT
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 270 CRM-M-56958-2022(O&M) Date of decision: 6th May, 2026 Aditya Dutt ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Sandeep Gahlawat, Advocate for the petitioner. (through VC) Mr. Neeraj Poswal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Ankit Bishnoi, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous since a petition seeking quashing of the same FIR, which is the subject matter of the present petition, on the basis of compromise, has already been allowed by this Court. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Since the main petition has already been disposed of, pending application, if any, is rendered infructuous. [MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 6th May, 2026 Parveen Sharma 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.05.07 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document