ABHISHEK MAHAJAN vs SHILPA MAHAJAN

Judgment text excerpt

$~87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 12.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 609/2026, CM APPL.28934/2026 ABHISHEK MAHAJAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nidhi Mohan Parashar, Mr. Harshit Joshi and Mr. Parthak Awasthi, Advs. versus SHILPA MAHAJAN .....Respondent Through: Ms. Preeti Singh, Mr. Sunklan Porwal, Ms. Sakshi Trivedi, Ms. Anuradha Anand, Ms. Anoushka Bajpai and Mr. Akshay Chhabra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) 1. It transpires that an SLP (C) No. No.15531/2026 was filed against the order dated 21.04.2026, passed in these proceedings, whereupon the following order dated 30.04.2026 has been passed: “1. The Family court is encouraged to decide the application filed by the petitioner-wife on 13th April, 2026 seeking modification of the impugned order dated 10th November, 2025 as early as possible, preferably any time before the returnable date, i.e. 29th May, 2026. 2. The application filed by the respondent-husband may also be considered together with the application for modification. 3. Till the returnable date, there shall be stay of operation of the last sentence of paragraph 6 of the impugned order dated 21st April, 2026.” 2. In terms of the aforesaid order, the said SLP is stated to be listed on Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT CONT.CAS(C) 609/2026 Page 1 of 2 KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:18.05.2026 11:34:14 29.05.2026. 3. The respective counsel for the parties are in agreement that in view of the order passed by the Supreme Court, the physical visitation as directed vide paragraph 6 of the order dated 21.04.2026, cannot be proceeded with. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to contact the minor child for half-an-hour between 04:00 and 06:00 PM, every Monday and Thursday. 4. Considering