AANCHAL GOYAL vs CANARA BANK

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 121 CWP-10926-2026 Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 AANCHAL GOYAL …Petitioner Versus CANARA BANK & OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Sahil Garg, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate and Mr. Teginder Singh, Advocate For respondent No.1 Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate For respondent Nos.2 & 3 Mr. D.K. Singal, Advocate and Mr. Rahul Garg, Advocate For respondent No.4 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking directions to de-freeze her Bank Accounts maintained with respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. Mr. D.K. Singal and Mr. Rahul Garg, Advocates have appeared and filed memorandum of appearance on behalf of respondent No.4. The same is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place. SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.05.12 15:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner made investment of Rs.33,000/- in an investment App. She received Rs.42,944/- from the said App. She is having 4 accounts with differ