Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-31

WRIT - C No. 9993 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 9993 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 9993 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9993 of 2026 Chandrapal Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalit Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Sharma, C.S.C. Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Lalit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- respondents, and Shri Akhilesh Kumar Sharma, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4, Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority (YEIDA). 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus declaring that the acquisition proceedings, initiated vide notification dated 26.02.2009 issued under Section 4 and notification dated 19.02.2010 issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in respect of the land in question, namely Khata No. 167, Khasra No. 996, measuring 0.7040 hectares, situated in Village Parasauli, Pargana Dankaur, Tehsil Sadar, District Gautam Buddh Nagar, has been lapsed under Sect

WRIT - C No. 9993 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam