WRIT - C No. 9767 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9767 of 2026 Vineeta Rajput And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Subhash Chander Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 81 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Phool Chandra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful life and also for a direction to provide protection. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are living together as husband and wife and they have apprehension of life threat from the respondent no..... 4. Per contra, learned Standing Counsel for the State opposed and submitted that the petitioner no.1 was already married and the act of the petitioners is illegal as petitioner no. 1 has not obtained decree of divorce from the competent court having jurisdiction. It is further submitted that the present controversy is squarely covered with the judgm