Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-16

WRIT - C No. 9736 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 9736 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 9736 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9736 of 2026 Chheddu .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Tiwari, Ram Yash Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State, Sri Azad Rai, learned counsel for the respondent-Gram Sabha and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the respondent/respondents to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case respondent/respondents feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to direct the respondent no.3-Additional Commissioner-II, Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj to decide the Appeal No.181 of 2025, Computerized Case No.C202502000000181 expeditiously. 4. It is argued by counsel for the petitioner that though a considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision h

WRIT - C No. 9736 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam