Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-16

WRIT - C No. 9608 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 9608 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 9608 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9608 of 2026 Smt. Shimla Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Singh Yadav, Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondents-State and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the private respondent to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the private respondent feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The petitioner has preferred the present petition with the prayer to direct the respondent no.2-Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil-Badlapur, District Jaunpur to decide Case No.16094 of 2025, Computerized Case No.T- 202514360216094 expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that an application filed under sub-rule (7) of Rules 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, is pending since long. At this stage it would be apt and appropriate to no

WRIT - C No. 9608 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam