Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-16

WRIT - C No. 9598 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 9598 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 9598 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9598 of 2026 Akhilesh Kumar Khare .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 18 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Durgesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Singh Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the private respondent to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the private respondent feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The petitioner has preferred the present petition with the following prayer:- [I] issue writ, order a or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate (Judicial), Gyanpur, Bhadohi/respondent no.2 to decide the Case 7212/21/2005-2006, Computer Case No. D200516670010 (Radhamohan and others Vs. Mithlesh Kumar and others), Under Section 229B, U.P.Z.A. L.R. Act, 1950 within stipulated and reasonable period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 4. It is argued

WRIT - C No. 9598 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam