Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-16

WRIT - C No. 9591 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 9591 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 9591 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9591 of 2026 Vishram .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 47 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Singh Yadav, Jawahar Lal Yadava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the private respondent to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the private respondent feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to direct the respondent No.2/Additional District Magistrate (Administration) Tehsil Martinganj District Azamgarh to decide Case No.3230 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.T2024150660003230) expeditiously. 4. The matter is pending before the respondent No.2 since long and considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter. 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disp

WRIT - C No. 9591 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam