Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-16

WRIT - C No. 9590 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 9590 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 9590 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9590 of 2026 Mahendra .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the private respondents to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the private parties feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to direct the respondent No.3/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Mehnagar, Azamgarh to decide Restoration Application fated03.04.2025 filed by the private respondent Nos.5 & 6 expeditiously. 4. The matter is pending before the respondent No3 since long and considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter. 5. In the facts and circumsta

WRIT - C No. 9590 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam