Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-13

WRIT - C No. 9434 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 9434 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 9434 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9434 of 2026 Ram Surat And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mainuddin Ahamad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the private respondent to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the private respondents feel aggrieved by the order their right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The petitioners have preferred the present petition with the prayer to direct the respondent Nos.2 & 3 to comply with the order dated 5.2.2022 passed in Case No. 4273 of 2021(Computerized Case No. T202115510104273) (Ram Surat vs. State ) as well as order dated 5.2.2022 in Case No. 4272 of 2021(Computerized Case No.T202115510104272) (Ram Surat vs. Sakhraj Bal Govind, Kailash) passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar Tehsil, Sadar, District Mau und

WRIT - C No. 9434 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam