Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-12

WRIT - C No. 9274 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 9274 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 9274 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9274 of 2026 Beena Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shanti Dhar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Singh Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the array of the parties. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and perused the record. 3. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the private respondents to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the private parties feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 4. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to direct the respondent No.2/Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Lalganj, District Mirzapur to decide Recall Application in RST Case No.3732 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.T2024166530203732) expeditiously. 4. The matter is pending before the respondent No.2 since long and considerable

WRIT - C No. 9274 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam