WRIT - C No. 919 of 2026 at Lucknow

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 919 of 2026 Neda .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyan Chandra Dubey, Rakesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ruby Choudhary Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the actions taken by the State Bank of India and the other respondent authorities in freezing the savings bank account of the petitioner maintained with the State Bank of India, Branch Iltifatganj, District Ambedkarnagar. 3. Upon perusal of the documents, it is clear that till date, no explanation has been provided to the petitioner with regard to why the bank account has been frozen. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State Bank of India has submitted that this freezing has been done by Local Head Office (LHO), State Bank of India at Gandhi Nagar upon an e-mail written by the Cyber Crime Cell, CID Crime, Gandhi Nagar. 5. It