Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-03-11

WRIT - C No. 9180 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 9180 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 9180 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9180 of 2026 Jagdish Narayan .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the opposite parties to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the opposite parties feel aggrieved by the order their right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to direct the respondent No.2/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Handiya, District Prayagraj to decide the Case No. 5328 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.T202502030405328) (Jagdish Narayan vs. Mata Prasad and others) filed under Section 144 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously. 4. The matter is pending before the Court below since long and considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter.

WRIT - C No. 9180 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam